Peer Reviewed

What's Your Diagnosis?

White Vulvar Plaques in an Eight-Year-Old Girl

Nadeen Awada, BS1 • Michelle Gallagher, DO2

  • Correct answer: A. Lichen Sclerosus

    Despite similarities in presentation, a close inspection of the area led to the diagnosis and exclusion of differentials. The patient was diagnosed based on distinguishable features on physical examination, including atrophic plaques and clitoral hood edema, which are clinically diagnostic of lichen sclerosus (LS). These unique clinical features include the “figure-of-eight” distribution, clitoral hood edema, telangiectasias, ecchymosis, fissure, erosions, scarring, and cutaneous atrophy.1

    The diagnosis of vulvovaginal candidiasis was considered. This is an infection most commonly caused by the yeast Candida albicans and is seen in areas of the female reproductive tract.2 This diagnosis is more common in women who are pregnant, using hormonal contraceptives, have diabetes, are immunocompromised, or with recent antibiotic use.3 Vulvovaginal candidiasis diagnosed in a younger population is typically due to recent antibiotic use or tight clothing, creating a moist environment for the yeast to grow.4 Though C. albicans is considered part of the normal flora, overgrowth of this yeast produces an inflammatory response with symptomatic consequences such as vaginal pain, pruritus, burning, and erythema.2 Cutaneous manifestations may vary from none to a mild erythema of the mucosa.4 Despite commonalities such as compulsive pruritus, lichen sclerosus tends to show hyperkeratotic and sclerotic skin changes and is without vaginal discharge, a feature that is otherwise characteristic of vulvovaginal candidiasis.5 Treatments for candida consist of antifungal drugs (most commonly azoles), topical preparations, or vaginal suppositories.2

    The diagnosis of vitiligo was also considered. Vitiligo is a depigmenting disorder caused by the destruction of melanocytes.6 The physical manifestations of this condition are milky white, non-scaly macules, and patches with distinct margins.6 Diagnosis of vitiligo is centered on sharply demarcated, depigmented areas of skin without other physical concern, whereas lichen sclerosus, in addition to ivory white or rose-colored patches, can present with areas of purpura, ecchymosis, fissures, and superficial erosions.1 The more common distribution seen with vitiligo is that of non-segmental vitiligo, which comprises a symmetrical and bilateral distribution.6 Its counterpart is segmental vitiligo, which is less commonly seen and manifests unilaterally.6 Vitiligo has been seen to coexist with cases of lichen sclerosus as a more mild and superficial subtype of LS coined vitiligo lichen sclerosus.7 This pattern of co-occurrence has been explained through the diseases’ similar pathogenetic mechanism of interface dermatitis along with other concurrent features that have strengthened the link between the two diseases.7 Despite no definitive cure existing for vitiligo, treatments such as corticosteroids and calcineurin inhibitors are first line, and phototherapy is second line.6 Recent studies and the FDA approval for JAK inhibitors, such as topical ruxolitinib for nonsegmental vitiligo, has proven to address melanocyte dysfunction through an immune-mediated mechanism.8 Treatments are most successful for the facial area but overall are unsatisfactory across the body.6

    Child abuse was also considered. Child abuse is mostly manifested cutaneously.9 In the clinic, it is important to take a detailed history and match the history to the physical findings. If what is being reported is not consistent with physical findings, this can indicate abuse.9 The most common physical findings of abuse are bruises, cuts, burns, bite marks, oral trauma, and traumatic alopecia.9 Suspicious bruising has been seen most commonly on the head and neck, in addition to areas such as the torso, ear, cheeks, and eye.10 Other alarming signs of abuse are petechial bruising and multiple bruises in a patterned manner, such as clustered or bilateral.10 Echymoses and bleeding in the perineal region are features of both sexual abuse and LS, but what separates the two are features in LS such as areas of hypopigmentation, atrophic skin, and telangiectasias.11

    Thorough physical examination and consideration of differential diagnoses resulted in the correct diagnosis and treatment of our pediatric patient without a painful biopsy.

    Treatment and management. The patient and mother were counseled and sent home with clobetasol 0.05% topical ointment. The patient was instructed to apply the ointment to the affected genital area once daily for a month and to follow up for a recheck in 1 month. They were told to contact the office if the lesions failed to improve despite the topical therapy.

    Outcome and follow-up. At her subsequent follow-up, her condition had improved significantly with resolution of the clitoral hood edema and purpura and overall improvement of the white plaques. She was instructed to change the application of clobetasol to every other day but to increase to daily again if symptoms of any pruritus and burning returned.

    Discussion. Lichen sclerosus is a chronic, inflammatory, mucocutaneous condition. It most commonly presents in the genital area of either prepubertal girls or postmenopausal women.12 The etiology of LS remains unknown, however, a link between LS and autoimmune diseases remains a strong factor in the diagnosis and understanding of this condition.13 The clinical characteristics of LS are typically white plaques and areas of atrophic skin in a “figure-of-eight” distribution with potential purpura or ecchymosis if there is associated hemorrhage.5 Girls with this condition can suffer from complications such as anogenital pruritus, constipation, and painful defecation. The progression of lichen sclerosus, from an area of erythema to subsequent white hyperkeratosis and atrophic skin, can culminate in severe scarring, which may then lead to vulvovaginal stenosis.5 This can narrow the vaginal introitus and bury the clitoris, consequently leading to dyspareunia.5 In pediatric patients, the diagnosis is often a clinical one, but biopsy can be performed if the presentation is not clear. In older patients, if the lesions progress without signs of healing, malignancy may ensue.5

    The first line treatment for this condition is ultrapotent topical corticosteroid ointment daily for 1 to 3 months, and then tapered to every other day as clinical improvement is noted.14 Aggressive treatment is necessary to prevent irreversible scarring. Patients should be followed clinically every 6 months for at least 2 years, as relapses are common.14 Calcineurin inhibitors can be used as a second line treatment, in addition to skin care to avoid irritation of the affected area.5

    Conclusion. In the case of this 8-year-old girl presenting with a pruritic skin eruption that demonstrates glistening white atrophic papules with telangiectasia, purpura, and clitoral hood edema, lichen sclerosus should be strongly considered. Lichen sclerosus can be assessed and diagnosed based on a thorough history and physical examination, keeping an eye out for the unique clinical features that help differentiate LS from closely related differential diagnoses.

     

    References:

    1. Veronesi G, Virdi A, Leuzzi M, et al. Vulvar vitiligo and lichen sclerosus in children: a clinical challenge. Pediatr Dermatol. 2021;38(5):1012-1019. doi:10.1111/pde.14771

    2. Willems HME, Ahmed SS, Liu J, Xu Z, Peters BM. Vulvovaginal candidiasis: a current understanding and burning questions. J Fungi. 2020;6(1):27. doi:10.3390/jof6010027

    3. Learn more about vaginal candidiasis (vaginal yeast infections). Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Published July 13, 2022. Accessed April 20, 2023. https://www.cdc.gov/fungal/diseases/candidiasis/genital/index.html#:~:text=

    4. Agana MG, Ryali B, Patel DR. Vulvovaginitis in adolescents. Pediatric Medicine. 2019;2(0). doi:10.21037/pm.2019.09.04

    5. Kirtschig G. Lichen sclerosus—presentation, diagnosis and management. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2016;113(19). doi:10.3238/arztebl.2016.0337

    6. Ezzedine K, Eleftheriadou V, Whitton M, Van Geel N. Vitiligo. Lancet. 2015;386(9988):74-84. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60763-7

    7. Attili VR, Attili SK. Acral vitiligo and lichen sclerosus - association or a distinct pattern?: A clinical and histopathological review of 15 ccases. Indian J Dermatol. 2015;60(5):519. doi:10.4103/0019-5154.164411

    8. Yousefian F, Yadlapati S, Browning J. The use of Janus kinase inhibitors and narrowband ultraviolet B combination therapy in non‐segmental vitiligo. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2023;22:1105-1107. doi:10.1111/jocd.15537

    9. Kos L, Shwayder T. Cutaneous manifestations of child abuse. Pediatr Dermatol. 2006;23(4):311-320. doi:10.1111/j.1525-1470.2006.00266.x

    10. Bentivegna K, Grant-Kels JM, Livingston N. Cutaneous manifestations of child abuse & neglect: part I. J Amer Acad Dermatol. 2022;87(3). doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2021.11.067

    11. Swerdlin A, Berkowitz C, Craft N. Cutaneous signs of child abuse. J Amer Acad Dermatol. 2007;57(3):371-392. doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2007.06.001

    12. Lichen sclerosus. DynaMed. Published July 20, 2023. Accessed April 11, 2024. https://www-dynamed-com.proxy2.cl.msu.edu/condition/lichen-sclerosus

    13. Lee A, Fischer G. Diagnosis and treatment of vulvar lichen sclerosus: an update for dermatologists. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2018;19(5):695-706. doi:10.1007/s40257-018-0364-7

    14. Simms-Cendan J, Hoover K, Marathe K, Tyler K. NASPAG clinical opinion: diagnosis and management of lichen sclerosis in pediatric and adolescent patients. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2022;35(2):112-120. doi:10.1016/j.jpag.2021.09.008


    AFFILIATIONS:
    1Michigan State University College of Osteopathic Medicine, East Lansing, MI
    2Assistant Professor, Department of Pediatrics, Michigan State University College of Osteopathic Medicine, East Lansing, MI

    CITATION:
    Awada N, Gallagher M. White vulvar plaques in an eight-year-old girl. Consultant. 2024;64(4):e1. doi:10.25270/con.2024.04.000003


    Received October 31, 2023. Accepted February 7, 2024. Published online April 17, 2024.

    DISCLOSURES:
    The authors report no relevant financial relationships.

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS:
    None.

    CORRESPONDENCE:
    Nadeen Awada, BS, Michigan State University College of Osteopathic Medicine, 965 Wilson Road, East Lansing, MI, 48824 (awadanad@msu.edu)


    ©2024 HMP Global. All Rights Reserved.
    Any views and opinions expressed are those of the author(s) and/or participants and do not necessarily reflect the views, policy, or position of Consultant360 or HMP Global, their employees, and affiliates.